Andrew Stephens, et al. v. County of Coconino, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Andrew Stephens, et al., No. CV-26-08183-PCT-JJT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 County of Coconino, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 At issue is pro se Plaintiffs Andrew Stephens, Michelle Kellison, and Scarlett 16 Stephens’ renewed Applications to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or 17 Costs. (Docs. 10, 11.) The Court finds the Applications again lack sufficient information 18 from which the Court can determine whether Plaintiffs have the means to pay the Court’s 19 fees. Specifically, Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.