Legal Opinion

The People v. Abdelouahad Afilal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2015No. 170PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the accusatory instrument dismissed. Defendant was charged with and pleaded guilty to criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 221.10 [1]). On appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the accusatory instrument, claiming that it fails to allege sufficient facts to establish the “public place” element of section 221.10 (1).

A person is guilty of criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree “when [such person] knowingly and unlawfully possesses . . . marihuana in a public place .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. DumayNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. DreydenNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. CruzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  2. People v. WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. People v. Burgess (Jerryed)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  4. People v. Cruz (Ruben)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  5. People v. Davenport (Ronald)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API