The People v. Abdelouahad Afilal
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the accusatory instrument dismissed. Defendant was charged with and pleaded guilty to criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 221.10 [1]). On appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the accusatory instrument, claiming that it fails to allege sufficient facts to establish the “public place” element of section 221.10 (1).
A person is guilty of criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree “when [such person] knowingly and unlawfully possesses . . . marihuana in a public place .…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. DumayNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. DreydenNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. CruzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- People v. WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
- People v. Burgess (Jerryed)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- People v. Cruz (Ruben)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- People v. Davenport (Ronald)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.