Smith v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original Proceeding in Mandamus. The material facts are stated in the opinion, filed on April 4, 1890.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
After the motion to quash the alternative writ issued in this case was sustained, at the July term for 1889, the plaintiff, with leave of the court, filed two amendments to the writ. To the writ as amended the defendants have filed another motion to quash.
We shall refer to the statute of limitations only, as we think that disposes of the case. The writ as demanded recites that the plaintiff completed the road-bed in accordance with the terms of his contract prior to the 30th day of June, 1872; that on or about June 30, 1872, he became the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sere & Laralde v. PitotSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Smith v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Smith v. Bourbon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Seaton v. G. C. Hixon & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Tennent v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Gifford v. SpehrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Parker v. DobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Hill v. Grand Lodge of the Independent Order of Odd FellowsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Young v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928