Fairchild v. Camac
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice.
The first objection is fatal to this judgment .The proof of a prior judgment is not given by the defendant, but appears .upon the bond and warrant of attorney, upon which this judgment was rendered, and which the plaintiff' himself gives in evidence, to support the present judgment. Taking it, then, as proved, that a judgment was entered on the 29th of October, 1803, the warrant of attorney was then functus officio.
As to the argument, that the warrant authorizes the attorney to confess a judgment or judgments, in the plural, there is nothing in it; the latter…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Campbell v. KentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
- Manufacturers & Mechanics' Bank of the Northern Liberties in the Co. v. CowdenNew York Supreme Court · 1842