Czernicke v. Ehrlich
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. G. A. Mosman, Judge. (1) It is tbe duty of a master to see that a minor employed by him to operate dangerous machinery knows not only of the dangers hut the extent of the dangers of such machinery. Wood’s Law of Master and Servant (2 Ed.), sec. 349, and notes, and sec. 350, and notes; Grizzle v. Frost, 3 Fost. & Findl. 622; Combs v. New Bedford Cordage Co., 102 Mass. 572; Dowling v. Allen, 74 Mo. 13; Yanesler v. Box Co., 108 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. G. A. Mosman, Judge. (1) It is tbe duty of a master to see that a minor employed by him to operate dangerous machinery knows not only of the dangers hut the extent of the dangers of such machinery. Wood’s Law of Master and Servant (2 Ed.), sec. 349, and notes, and sec. 350, and notes; Grizzle v. Frost, 3 Fost. & Findl. 622; Combs v. New Bedford Cordage Co., 102 Mass. 572; Dowling v. Allen, 74 Mo. 13; Yanesler v. Box Co., 108 Mo. App. 628; Bummell v. Dilworth, Porter & Co., 19 Atl. 345; Tag v. McG-eorge (Pa.), 26 Atl. 671; Boland v. Railroad, 36 Mo.…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
— This is a suit by the plaintiff, an infant, by his next friend, for damages sustained by him by having his hand caught in the sandpaper-smoothing machine owned and operated by the defendants, and about which plaintiff was employed to work when about fifteen years of age without any previous experience.
It is alleged that the said machine was defectively and negligently constructed, maintained and operated, in this, that at the corners of the end of the machine, at which said boards or other material came out from *390the machine, there were obstructions which impeded, obstructed and prevented…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Dolner v. The MonticelloU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1870
- Porter v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Dowling v. Gerard B. Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Lore v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Patrum v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Wilson v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Austin v. Bluff City Shoe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Evans v. General Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Crandall v. McGilvraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.