Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Department of Commerce
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 7, 2017No. 20160091-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
Judge David N. Mortensen authored this Opinion, in which Judges Kate A. Toomey and Jill M. Pohlman concurred.
1Opinion of the Court
MORTENSEN, Judge:
¶1 Brent Allen Morgan asks us to conclude that because he is a private individual, unlicensed to sell securities in the state of Utah, the Utah Division of Securities should not have been able to wait as long as it did before bringing an administrative proceeding against him for allegedly violating the Utah Uniform Securities Act. 1 Because the statutes of limitations Morgan identified do not apply, we decline to disturb the Department of Commerce's order, which allowed the proceeding to go forward.
¶2 In August 2014, the Division filed a notice of agency action and order to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Evolocity, Inc. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Lorenzo v. Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- Rogers v. Division of Real Estate of the Department of Business RegulationsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Phillips v. Department of Commerce, Division of SecuritiesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bouchard v. State Emps. Ret. Comm'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Grillone v. Peace Officer StandardsUtah Supreme Court · 2025
- Grillone v. Peace Officer StandardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023