Legal Opinion

Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Caterpillar, Inc. (Employer) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which reversed a referee’s decision denying benefits to Rosetta Showers (Claimant). The Board determined that Claimant established good cause for her violation of a company work rule and, thus, remained eligible for unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

On February 25, 1993, after 19 years on the job, Employer discharged Claimant for being absent for three days without proper notification and approval. Prior to the discharge, Claimant was absent from work during…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKeesport Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Hercules, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Allen v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Partsch v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. D.J. Khouri v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. FBO Services, Inc. v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. V. Leao v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API