Legal Opinion

People v. Baxter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reserved decision and remitted this matter to Onondaga County Court to make findings of fact and a determination whether defendant was present at the in-chambers Sandoval hearing (People v Baxter, 226 AD2d 1116). The testimony at the reconstruction hearing supports the court’s determination that defendant was present at the hearing (see, People v Terry, 225 AD2d 1058, lv denied 88 NY2d 886).

The contention that trial counsel was ineffective in failing properly to move for dismissal of the indictment was not raised when the appeal was initially…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. TerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API