Glauber Manufacturing Co. v. Voter

The deposition upon which the plaintiffs rested contained competent evidence tending to show that in response to an order for the merchandise sued for, received from their selling agent and purporting to come from the defendants, they delivered the goods to a common carrier, addressed to the defendants. Such delivery was a compliance with the contract of sale alleged and a delivery to-the defendants. Arnold v. Prout, 51 N. H. 587; Garland v. Lane, 46 N. H. 245, 248; Woolsey v. Bailey, 27 N. H. 217; Smith v. Smith, 27 N. H. 244, 252.

The remaining question is whether there was any evidence upon…