Legal Opinion

Washington State Motorcycle Dealers Ass'n v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1988No. 53755-1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*669Andersen, J.—

Facts of Case

The 62nd amendment to the Constitution of the State of Washington sets forth the veto power of the Governor. It provides that a governor "may not object to less than an entire section" of a nonappropriation bill. Const. art. 3, § 12 (amend. 62). We hold that the 62nd Amendment means what it says, and that the Governor's vetoes of less than entire sections of the Motorcycle Dealers' Franchise Act (a nonappropriation bill), enacted at the 1985 regular session, are void.

In 1985 the Legislature passed Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 3333, the Motorcycle Dealers'…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. LyttakerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Anderson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Washington State Legislature v. LowryWashington Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API