Krehnbrink v. Testa (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurring in the judgmentKennedy, J.
{¶ 33} I concur only in the majority’s judgment affirming the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”). I write separately to express concern about the cavalier attitude of appellee, the tax commissioner, in failing to meet the case-*137management deadline established in Ohio Adm.Code 5717 — 1—07(A)(3)(f) and about the BTA’s failure to ensure that its procedural rules are enforced.
{¶ 34} Reasonable procedural rules adopted pursuant to statutory authority have the “force and effect” of law. Lyden Co. v. Tracy, 76 Ohio St.3d 66, 69, 666 N.E.2d 556 (1996). “Certainly, if the administrative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Weckel v. Cole + Russell ArchitectsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.