Legal Opinion

In re Andrew B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*639The Family Court’s determination that the mother abused Andrew B. by repeatedly subjecting him to unnecessary medical treatment, either as a result of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy or otherwise, and derivatively neglected his sibling Lauren B., is supported by legally sufficient evidence and the preponderance of the credible evidence (see Matter of Patrick GG., 286 AD2d 540 [2001]; Matter of Suffolk County Dept, of Social Servs. [Ellen S.], 215 AD2d 395, 396 [1995]). The evidence established a history of repeated fabrication as to Andrew’s medical conditions, including her assertions for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re of Amber C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re Suffolk County Department of Social Services ex rel. Aaron S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re Patrick GG.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Amber Gold J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Braverman v. BravermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. In re Elizabeth W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re Angel F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. In re Salvatore M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API