Legal Opinion

Grimsey v. Lawyers Title Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1972PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The- award for the amount of plaintiffs ’ counsel fees was proper insofar as it embraced the cost of services rendered in defense of the claim of title interposed against the plaintiffs but was unauthorized to the extent that it included attorneys’ fees incurred in prosecuting the action brought against the title insurance company and now before us (Doyle v. Allstate Ins. Co., 1 N Y 2d 439); and remand is necessary for determination of the amount of the attorneys’ fees properly incurred in the defense of the title action -and for modification of the judgment accordingly.…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. NY Univ. v. CONT'L INS CONew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Diversified Mortgage Investors v. U. S. Life Title Insurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Niagara County v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API