Legal Opinion

Fires v. Kinney-Shotts Inv. Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1933No. 1432-6071PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDY,. Judge.

Plaintiff in' error executed a promissory note, payable to Wes-Tex Auto Sales Company, Inc. There was nothing upon the face of the note indicating that it was tainted with usury. It provided merely for the payment of 8 per cent, interest from maturity.

For a valuable consideration defendant in error purchased said note before maturity, and the maker paid to it the amount of unpaid principal and interest. He then brought this suit against defendant in error to recover the statutory penalty of double the amount of interest so paid, on the ground that the exaction of such interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilder v. HearneTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McDaniel v. OrrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Fires v. Kinney-Shotts Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Texas Farm Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. National Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. MahaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. C & K INVESTMENTS v. Fiesta Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Davis v. BolingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Hamor v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API