Legal Opinion
Zeckendorf v. Lutz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 17, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered on or about November 22, 2000, which granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The causes of action in the amended complaint for trespass, abuse of process and violation of 42 USC § 1983, arising out of the entry of defendants, the attorneys for the judgment creditors, into plaintiff judgment debtor’s residence at the Delmonico Hotel pursuant to an ex parte order of the Supreme Court, New York County, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Andesco, Inc. v. PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Safie v. SafieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- Casa De Meadows Inc. (Cayman Islands) v. ZamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- 3H ENTERPRISES, INC. v. DwyreDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Dashdevs LLC v. Capital Mkts. Placement, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Dashdevs LLC v. Capital Mkts. Placement, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Cla-Mil East Holding Corp. v. Medallion Funding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.