Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoule, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether sections 300 through 309 of the Town Law are unconstitutional so far as they pertain to the facts in this case.

Plaintiffs reside on 158 acres of land which they own in the Town of Fairfield, New York. They keep no livestock on their land, only 10 acres of which are under cultivation. Their lands are bounded on the north, and partially on the east, by 200 acres of land owned and occupied by defendants, who operate a dairy farm and graze 110 milking cows. The common boundary is approximately 2,200 feet in length.

Section 300 of the Town Law provides…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Shilbury v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. McCartney v. AustinNew York Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gravert v. NebergallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Choquette v. PerraultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. In Re the June 9, 2000 Fence Viewing Petition of BaileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980
  5. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API