Legal Opinion

Klysz v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1928No. 25,278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The two appellants, jointly with Mike Nagy, were prosecuted by affidavit, in two counts, for unlawfully: (1) Possessing intoxicating liquor; and (2) maintaining a common nuisance, §§4 and 24, ch. 48, Acts 1925, §§2717 and 2740 Burns 1926.

Trial by the court resulted in the conviction of the appellants on the second charge and in their acquittal on the first charge. Nagy, who is not a party to this appeal, was convicted on the first charge and acquitted on the second.

Appellants assign as error the overruling of their motion for a new trial. One of the fifty-three alleged grounds for this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Betts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Voght v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Manley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heyverests v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Shepherd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Schreiber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Mueller v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API