Randall v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
On information duly filed, the appellants, Randall and Carmack, were jointly tried and convicted of the offense of possession of burglary tools (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-1006 [Repl. 1964] ), and they bring this appeal. The motion for new trial contains nine assignments, but the appellants insist here on only the two points which we now list and discuss.
I
The appellants state their first point: “The Court erred in admitting in evidence certain tools discovered by the Sheriff, after appellants ’ arrests, and after the time of the alleged commission of the offense…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- McAlister v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Clardy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- McConnell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Parrott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Ballew v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Fulwider v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Norris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.