Legal Opinion

Baum v. Bell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 5, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The affidavit upon which the warrant in this case was issued was as follows: “South Carolina — Kershaw County. “Before me personally appeared Herman Baum, who, being duly sworn, on oath says: That on or about the 28rrl day of December, 1885, George W. Barnes transferred and assigned, for value received, to H. Baum a rent lien executed by J. J. Bell on the first day of December, 1885, whereby he gave to the said G. W. Barnes a lien on all of the crops to be raised on the…

Read the full summary

The affidavit upon which the warrant in this case was issued was as follows: “South Carolina — Kershaw County. “Before me personally appeared Herman Baum, who, being duly sworn, on oath says: That on or about the 28rrl day of December, 1885, George W. Barnes transferred and assigned, for value received, to H. Baum a rent lien executed by J. J. Bell on the first day of December, 1885, whereby he gave to the said G. W. Barnes a lien on all of the crops to be raised on the Mobley plantation, in the said county and State, during the year 1886, to secure the payment of three hundred and…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Simpson.

The defendant, respondent, was a tenant, for the year 1886, on a plantation in Kershaw County, known as the Mobley place, and which, as it appears, belonged to one Mrs. M. A. Mobley. The contract of tenancy, however, which was in writing, was made with one George W. Barnes, who is styled in said contract as lessor. The rental was $825, due on October 1,1886, to secure which a lien on the crops to be grown on the place during that year was given. This contract, some time before it fell due, was transferred by Barnes to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coker & Co. v. BarfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API