Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Fletcher, Tilton & Whipple, P.C.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
On the ground that the plaintiffs’ claim was barred by the statute of limitations, a judge of the Superior Court allowed the defendants’ motion under Mass. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) (6), 365 Mass. 754 (1974), to dismiss the complaint for malpractice. The plaintiffs appealed. We transferred the appeal here and now affirm the judgment.
This action was commenced on July 1, 1983. The parties agree that actions for malpractice against the defendant attorneys are governed by the statute of limitations set forth in G. L. c. 260, § 4, as appearing in St. 1981, c. 765. See Cioffi v. Guenther, 374 Mass. 1, 3…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- White v. Peabody Construction Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Olsen v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Williams v. ElyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- International Mobiles Corp. v. Corroon & Black/Fairfield & Ellis, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Grunwald v. BronkeshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Cantu v. St. Paul CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Murphy v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.