Legal Opinion

United States v. George G. Rogers

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 17, 1996No. 94-4692PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

A jury found appellant George Rogers guilty of committing various firearms violations named in a three count indictment. He now appeals the convictions, claiming that reversible error occurred when the district court failed to instruct the jury on an essential element of each of the offenses. Though the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict on one of the three counts, we deem the instructional omission to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and thus affirm on the remaining two charges.

I. BACKGROUND

After arresting…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. DeFries, Clayton E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. Norman Parker v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Coley QUINN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Ladish Malting Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API