Legal Opinion

Little v. Mangano

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1996No. 96-C-2232Published

1Opinion of the Court

1, BYRNES, Judge.

Relator complains that the trial court should have granted his exception of prescription based on a two month time period rather than one year.

Plaintiffs, Allen and Kenny Little, purchased a pair of ostrich chicks from defendant/relator, Salvador Mangano, in October 1993. The Littles picked up the chicks in December 1993. Veterinarian testing in August 1994 proved that both chicks were roosters. The Littles filed a redhibition action against Mangano on February 23, 1995, alleging that they purchased the birds for breeding purposes and their biological inability to produce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sotomayor v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Smith v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Vallette v. ToussaintLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API