Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1944No. 30391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntvke, J.

1. The accused was. charged with the manufacture of intoxicating liquors. Applying the rule laid down in Yonce v. State, 154 Ga. 419 (114 S. E. 325), and Flint v. State, 29 Ga. App. 222 (114 S. E. 585), both of which were cases of manufacturing intoxicating liquors, to the evidence in the instant case, the verdict was authorized.

Decided February 24, 1944. M. G. Hides, J. F. Kelly, for plaintiff in error. Henderson L. Lanhamj solicitor-general, contra.

2. In the Yonee case, supra, the Supreme Court answered a certified question from this court, and laid down a rule which was later embodied in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yonce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Flint v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API