Legal Opinion

Elkins v. McCaskill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1912No. Gen. No. 17,365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Abnold Heat, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

By this writ of error, plaintiff seeks to reverse a judgment for defendants, entered upon a directed verdict. Defendants are lawyers and were employed as such hy one Schillinger and others to represent them in a suit brought against them by Elkins. The latter recovered a judgment and defendants, on behalf of their clients, sued out a writ of error in the Appellate Court. Through some mistake or misunderstanding, the MeCasldlls neglected to file their briefs and abstracts in apt time. Steele and Thompson, attorneys for Elkins, served notice that-they would ask the court to dismiss the writ of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Funk v. BabbittIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Spinks v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Watt v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Adye v. HannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. McNair ex rel. White v. PlattIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. L. S. Cogswell Lbr. Co. v. ManahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Lazowski v. PetimezasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API