Legal Opinion

Schmoll v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 8, 1940No. 42519-BPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGheeN, Judge

This is a suit on a contract made with the defendant by Murch Brothers Construction Company, Inc., and performed by that company and its subcontractors. It was originally brought by the contractor. Thereafter, for reasons not necessary to be set out here, by leave of court the present plaintiff was substituted as trustee and has succeeded to all the rights of the contracting company.

The plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $4,632.51, representing liquidated damages assessed and deducted by the contracting officer at the time of final settlement, and also the additional sum of $30,418.15 on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Jefferson Hotel Co. v. BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
  3. McCloskey ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  4. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Prestex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Pathman Construction Co. v. Hi-Way Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Wunderlich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API