People v. . Wilmarth

During the impaneling of the jury, one Hollenbeck was called as a juror, and examined as to his qualifications. He testified among other things, that he had read what purported to be the testimony in regard to this matter taken before the committing magistrate; that in reading it he had formed an opinion in regard to the guilt or innocence of the defendant Wilmarth ; that such opinion was decided and fixed, and evidence would be required to remove it. “ Q. And considerable too? A. Considerable. Q. You think that you are as unbiased and unprejudiced to sit in this case as you would have been…