Legal Opinion

People v. Chang

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 29, 1976Published

1Opinion of the CourtMax H. Galfunt, J.

The defendants move to suppress certain evidence which the People seek to introduce at the present trial. The defendants presently are being tried for obscenity. The defendants contend that the People are estopped from introducing the evidence of alleged acts of sodomy due to a prior acquittal of the defendants on a charge of consensual sodomy. The point raised by the defense appears to be unique in this jurisdiction.

The factual pattern of the situation evolved as follows:

The defendants were initially tried on the charges of consensual sodomy (Penal Law, § 130.38) and promotion of obscenity1…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API