Kramer v. K.O. Lee Son Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion
In a petition for rehearing plaintiffs ask that the former decision be modified in two particulars. It is said that this court erred: (1) "in deciding that the appellant is entitled to set off the judgment which was awarded to it for costs and disbursements on the former appeal;" and (2) "in holding and deciding that the appellant should be awarded costs on this appeal." These propositions will be considered in the order stated.(1) It is true, as plaintiffs' counsel assert, in this state judgments may not be set off one against the other in such manner as to defeat the exemption laws.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fahey v. Esterley Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Cleveland v. McCannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Hoyt v. GodfreyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
- Damp v. Town of DaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Johnson v. FarrellNew York Supreme Court · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.