Willingham v. State

Eberhardt, Judge.

The State contends that appellant in effect admitted in her statement that she was guilty of larceny after trust in regard to the money she had saved from the allot ment from her husband who was in the Army, and that the officer’s testimony as to her having stated that she had stolen was no worse than this admission. The argument is that the Army has two kinds of allotments; that the first kind is the required allotment for dependents; that the second kind is optional, a means of saving money during service in the armed forces; that the latter kind has an economic value to…