Legal Opinion
People v. Vasquez
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1983No. Crim. 41626PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
The People appeal from the granting of defendants’ Penal Code section 995 motion to dismiss an information charging defendants with burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) After reviewing the transcript of the preliminary hearing, the trial court ruled there was an illegal search of two pillowcases containing items taken in the burglary of an apartment and granted defendants’ motion to suppress the evidence contained in the pillowcases. We reverse.
Statement of Facts
Harry Mamell lives at 425 South Parkview Street, Los Angeles. He came home at approximately 2:15 p.m. on July 23,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Robbins v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Baraka H.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. SimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021