Zimmerman v. Marsh
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
365 S.C. 383 (2005)
618 S.E.2d 898
Steven J. ZIMMERMAN & Sarah M. Zimmerman, Respondents,
v.
Vicki Lane MARSH, Petitioner.
No. 26029.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard May 17, 2005.
Decided August 15, 2005.
Robert H. Gwin, III, of Gwin Law Offices, L.L.C., of Myrtle Beach, for petitioner.
Robert H. O'Donnell, of O'Donnell Law Firm, L.L.C., of Georgetown, for respondents.
Justice MOORE:
This action arose when respondents (Zimmermans) sought the partition of a parcel of property they jointly owned with petitioner (Marsh). The master-in-equity found partition by allotment was not feasible and ordered a…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schnell v. SchnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Rowe v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Fike v. SharerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.