Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Marsh

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 15, 2005No. 26029Published

1Opinion of the Court

365 S.C. 383 (2005)

618 S.E.2d 898

Steven J. ZIMMERMAN & Sarah M. Zimmerman, Respondents,

v.

Vicki Lane MARSH, Petitioner.

No. 26029.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard May 17, 2005.

Decided August 15, 2005.

Robert H. Gwin, III, of Gwin Law Offices, L.L.C., of Myrtle Beach, for petitioner.

Robert H. O'Donnell, of O'Donnell Law Firm, L.L.C., of Georgetown, for respondents.

Justice MOORE:

This action arose when respondents (Zimmermans) sought the partition of a parcel of property they jointly owned with petitioner (Marsh). The master-in-equity found partition by allotment was not feasible and ordered a…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schnell v. SchnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rowe v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Fike v. SharerOregon Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API