Legal Opinion

Magdaleno v. Nebraska Panhandle Community Action Agency

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1976No. 40338PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This appeal is from a trial de novo in the District Court after that court sustained the finding of the Workmen’s Compensation Court on a direct appeal. Both courts found Karen Magdaleno, plaintiff, had failed to maintain her burden of proving the disabilities she now suffers are the result of an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of her employment by the defendant, Nebraska Panhandle Community Action Agency, and dismissed her petition. We affirm.

To point up the issue it is only necessary to briefly sketch the testimony. Plaintiff injured her back in April of 1968 when she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gifford v. AG Lime, Sand and Gravel CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Snowardt v. City of KimballNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Adler v. Jerryco Motors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Gotfrey v. Shizuo SakuradaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clearwater Corp. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Riley v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Palma v. BartaNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API