Williams v. Golden
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 145, Oct. T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of C.. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1912, No. 890, on verdict for plaintiff in case of John Williams, Incorporated, v. James T. Golden and Linville H. Crick, partners doing business as Golden & Crick. Assumpsit for balance due on a contract fOr work, labor and materials.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 145, Oct. T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of C.. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1912, No. 890, on verdict for plaintiff in case of John Williams, Incorporated, v. James T. Golden and Linville H. Crick, partners doing business as Golden & Crick. Assumpsit for balance due on a contract fOr work, labor and materials. Shafer, J., filed the following opinion: The defendants, Golden & Crick, are general contractors and had a contract to make certain alterations and improvements in the banking house of the Duquesne National Bank in Pittsburgh, Pa. A very considerable part of these…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The facts in this case appear in the opinion of the learned court below, refusing a new trial and denying defendants’ motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. The questions raised on this appeal having been properly disposed of in that opinion, the judgment is affirmed on it.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. v. ErwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. NansonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Creamery Package Mfg. Co. v. Cheyenne Ice Cream Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- Vilter Manufacturing Co. v. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- Philadelphia Gear Wks. v. Read mach.co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.