Legal Opinion

Dornbusch v. Dornbusch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*809The trial court erred in granting custody of the parties’ four children to defendant. It is beyond cavil that the paramount concern in all custody matters is the best interests of the child (Matter of Nehra v Uhlar, 43 NY2d 242). In an initial custody battle, there is no presumption in favor of either parent (Domestic Relations Law § 240).

The wife admitted that she carried on a secret affair of over a year’s duration and that she would invite her paramour to spend time at the marital home, with the children present, when the husband was away. On at least one occasion, the wife had relations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nehra v. UhlarNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Galanos v. GalanosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Rosenberg v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Scott M. v. Ilona M.New York Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Setty v. KoenekeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Anne D. v. Raymond D.New York Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API