Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dzurenko v. Jordache, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1982Published

1Dissent

Kupferman, J. P.,

dissents in part in a memorandum as follows: I dissent and would reverse and reinstate the causes of action for violation of right of privacy as against the defendants-respondents Jordache, Inc. and Harvard, Peskin and Edrick, Inc. (H. P. & E.). The plaintiff is a fashion model. In 1979, through the advertising agency H. P. & E. for defendant Jordache, a company which manufactures jeans, he was asked to participate in a photo session for which he signed a release. He specifically wrote in on the consent form the words “magazine ad use only”. The picture was later widely used…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Welch v. Mr. Christmas Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API