Legal Opinion

West Suburban Bank v. Lattemann

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 1996No. 2-95-1545PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger

The intervenor, Costas Kappos, was the purchaser at a sale held pursuant to a judgment foreclosing a second mortgage on residential real estate. The plaintiff, West Suburban Bank, was the mortgagee. This court vacated the judgment and the sale as void because the plaintiff failed to serve one of the mortgagors. We also ruled that Kappos was entitled to the $80,000 he paid for the property and remanded the cause for further proceedings. West Suburban Bank v. Lattemann, 269 Ill. App. 3d 1143 (1995) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23).

On remand, the plaintiff tendered Kappos the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Estate of Wernick v. MacKsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Geise v. Phoenix Co. of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Buzz Barton & Associates, Inc. v. GiannoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Puget Sound Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Jones v. Hryn Development, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. People v. SheltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Jones v. Hryn Development, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. N In Comm Trans Dist v. Chicago S Shore/S Bend RRIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API