In re Sipal Realty Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The petitioner brought this proceeding to fix the reasonable rent for all the suites in a building owned by it, pursuant to the provisions of the Business Rent Law. (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd., § 2, subd. [a], par. [2]; subd. [c].) Petitioner asserts that the apartments occupied by the respondents constitute business space because more than 60% of the total space in the building is lawfully occupied as business space. Special and Trial Term fixed the rents at the statutory percentages and directed that the rentals so' fixed should be paid from May *3229, 1957, the date of the commencement of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- 114 East 40th Corp. v. ArmstrongNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- In re Sipal Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by2 opinions
- 3849 Associates v. BonimeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Vendome v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002