Legal Opinion
Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
Defendant Hughes Tool Company (Toolco) moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rules 12(b) (1) and 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter and that the complaint fails to state any claim upon which relief can be granted. The original notice of motion was filed on August 9th, 1961 and in addition to the grounds now urged requested summary judgment pursuant to rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In effect, the present notice of motion brings on for hearing the original…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Hughes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.