Legal Opinion

United States v. Toner

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1948No. 14001PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

Defendants were charged with violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 88, 1 conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C.A. § 80, 2 and in five counts respectively with violation of Section 80. McLaughlin immediately before trial plead nolo contendere. 3 Toner was found guilty by a jury. Toner moves for judgment of acquittal 4 and in the alternative for a new trial. 5

At the conclusion of the charge of the court no exceptions in compliance with Rule 30 6 were taken. Defense counsel requested that all exhibits be sent out with the jury. The trial covered a period of five days including two night…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. StoehrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. United States v. Plymouth Coupe (1941) Serial Number 15051526District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. United States v. El Rancho Adolphus Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. United States v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API