United States v. Toner
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
Defendants were charged with violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 88, 1 conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C.A. § 80, 2 and in five counts respectively with violation of Section 80. McLaughlin immediately before trial plead nolo contendere. 3 Toner was found guilty by a jury. Toner moves for judgment of acquittal 4 and in the alternative for a new trial. 5
At the conclusion of the charge of the court no exceptions in compliance with Rule 30 6 were taken. Defense counsel requested that all exhibits be sent out with the jury. The trial covered a period of five days including two night…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. StoehrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- United States v. Plymouth Coupe (1941) Serial Number 15051526District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- United States v. El Rancho Adolphus Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- United States v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.