Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matimak Trading Co. v. Albert Khalily, D/B/A Unitex Mills, Inc., and D.A.Y. Kids Sportswear Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 27, 1997No. 1251, Docket 96-9117Published

1DissentAltimari, Circuit Judge

In the waning days of the United Kingdom’s sovereignty over Hong Kong, the majority’s holding is a death knell for Hong Kong corporations seeking access to our federal courts under alienage jurisdiction. Because I believe the failure to recognize Hong Kong as a “foreign state” or as a “citizen or subject” of the United Kingdom—at this critical juncture—is contrary to the purposes of alienage jurisdiction—I respectfully dissent.

As Dorothy said in the Wizard of Oz: “if I ever go looking for my heart’s desire ... I won’t look any further than my own backyard.” This applies with equal force when…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dorothy A. Wilson and Louis P. Wilson v. Humphreys (Cayman) Limited, a Corporation, and Holiday Inns, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Netherlands Shipmortgage Corporation, Ltd. v. Mark Madias and Nicholas T.K. SkarvelisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Murarka v. Bachrack Bros., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Timco Engineering, Inc. v. Rex & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Tetra Finance (HK) Ltd. v. ShaheenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API