Whitted v. Fuquay.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ActioN by W. A. Wliitted. and W. W. Wliitted against A. P. Euquay and T. B. Crowder, beard by Judge W. A. PLolce and a jury, at Spring Term, 1900, of Wake Superior Court. Erom judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtEurches, J.
This is an action upon an alleged contract for the sale of land in which a specific performance is der manded. The relief prayed for was refused, and plaintiffs appealed to this Court. There were two issues submitted to the jury, upon which they passed: (1) Did the defend; ant, A. P. Euquay, contract and agree in writing to convey to plaintiffs the lands described in complaint at tile 'price of $1,000, as of date 19th November, 1898, reserving one acre near spring?. Ans. Yes. (2) Would the specific enforcement of such contract be oppressive and inequitable’?''- Ans. Yes.” There were other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stamper v. . StamperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Ijames v. . GaitherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Ramsay v. . GheenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Kitchen v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851
- Bryson v. . PeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Combes v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- State v. MaultsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Ward v. . AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.