Legal Opinion

Goodstein v. Goodstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1992No. 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this appeal, inter alia, we decide whether under the Divorce Code1 the 50% limit on garnishment of wages for nonpayment of alimony is properly calculated on 50% of an individual’s gross wages, or, as determined by the trial court, on 50% of an individual’s net wages. We find that section 3703 of the Divorce Code permits garnishment of up to 50% of an obligor’s gross wages. For this reason, as well as others outlined in the opinion, we reverse the order of the trial court.

In this appeal, plaintiff-appellant Malka Goodstein is challenging the trial court’s order of garnishment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Young J. Lee, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue, Bureau of State LotteriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Orie v. StoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Pa. Dept. of Corr. v. Un. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Wilkes-Barre Clay Products Co. v. KoroneosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Com. v. Orie Melvin, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. M. Humphreys, Ins. Comm'r. of the Com. of PA v. SureTec Ins. Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API