Goodstein v. Goodstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
In this appeal, inter alia, we decide whether under the Divorce Code1 the 50% limit on garnishment of wages for nonpayment of alimony is properly calculated on 50% of an individual’s gross wages, or, as determined by the trial court, on 50% of an individual’s net wages. We find that section 3703 of the Divorce Code permits garnishment of up to 50% of an obligor’s gross wages. For this reason, as well as others outlined in the opinion, we reverse the order of the trial court.
In this appeal, plaintiff-appellant Malka Goodstein is challenging the trial court’s order of garnishment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Young J. Lee, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue, Bureau of State LotteriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Orie v. StoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pa. Dept. of Corr. v. Un. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Wilkes-Barre Clay Products Co. v. KoroneosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Com. v. Orie Melvin, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- M. Humphreys, Ins. Comm'r. of the Com. of PA v. SureTec Ins. Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024