Kermit F. Gabel and Henry S. Stiehl v. James A. Lynaugh, Director Texas Department of Corrections Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The district court’s judgment of dismissal is affirmed for the reasons stated in its Memorandum Order filed March 23, 1987. These apply to the claims advanced before that court; we do not consider those sought to be added before us. Generally speaking, we are a court of errors and appeals; and the trial court cannot have erred as to matters which were not presented to it.
We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the action is frivolous and subject to dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). We further conclude that the briefing of this meritless and frivolous appeal renders the pro se…
2Cited by42 opinions
- Charles Richard Stone v. Rick Harry Anita Schlank Deborah Konieska Rhonda Heskin Amy Anderson Lori Parkos Jim LindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Lewis Yaklich, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee. Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Mary SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Arthur X. Carson v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Dennis Wayne Wilson v. Enrique M. Barrientos, Terry W. Huntsberry v. ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.