Lincoln Grain Co. v. M & H WAREHOUSE
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiffs in an action for damages sustained by them to grain in a fire in defendants’ warehouse appeal from judgment in favor of defendants.
Questions Presented
1. Is a warehouseman’s burden of proving due care satisfied under California law existing at the time of the fire without proving how the fire started?
2. Instructions:(a) Failure to instruct that defendants must explain the cause of the fire.(b) Instructions on reasonable care.(c) Instructions on unavoidable accident.
3. Admissibility of state inspector’s report record.
Record
On November 8, 1965, plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Hanson v. Wells Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Shockley v. Tennyson Transfer & Storage, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Foss Launch & Tug Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Foss Launch & Tug Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977