Legal Opinion
Hasbro, Inc. v. Catalyst Usa, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 3, 2004No. 02-4301PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Although companies often choose arbitration with the hope of avoiding the (presumed) greater time and expense of litigating in court, that was not the fate of the parties in this case. Hasbro, Inc. and Catalyst USA, Inc. waited more than two years for a final award from an arbitration panel that was adjudicating a dispute between them about a software license. After the award was finally issued, the losing party, Catalyst, asked the district court to vacate the arbitral award. The court agreed that this was appropriate on the ground that the arbitrators had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. GarveySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Mary Decker Slaney v. The International Amateur Athletic Federation and the United States Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- William Riccard v. Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Zurich American Insurance v. Watts Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- LAS PALMAS MEDICAL CENTER v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
- Standard Security Life Insuran v. FCE Benefit Administrators, InCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Titan Tire Corp. of Freeport, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Gower v. Turquoise Properties Gulf, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.