Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Hamilton's Estate

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1935No. 24973. En BancPublished

1DissentHolcomb, J.

(dissenting) — I am obliged to emphatically disagree with the prevailing opinion in this case, which utterly disregards our statutes and ignores our precedents, and they are not discussed. It should never become the law of this state. In one thing only is it correct, and that is that the first deed was not accepted or delivered. Showalter v. Spangle, 93 Wash. 326, 160 Pac. 1042.

The deed is in our statutory form. Rem. Rev. Stat., §10552 [P. O. §1908-29]. It was also authorized by Rem. Rev. Stat., § 10572 [P. C. § 1443], which provides for conveyances from a husband to his wife and from a wife…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. JoughinWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Showalter v. SpangleWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bloor v. BloorWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Shorett v. SignorWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Chapman v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API