Legal Opinion
Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern Union Gas Co., Southern California Gas Co., El Paso Natural Gas Co., Pacific Gas & Electric Co., People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Intervenors. Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. And City of Willcox v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Asarco, Inc., Southern Union Company, People of the State of California, General Motors Corporation, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Tucson Gas & Electric Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, Southern California Gas Company, Arizona Public Service Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern California Edison Company, Intervenors. Southern California Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern Union Co., People of the State of California, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, General Motors Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Tucson Gas & Electric Co., Arizona Public Service Co., San Diego Gas & Electric Co., El Paso Natural Gas Co., Southern California Edison Co., Arizona Electric Power Coop., City of Willcox, Intervenors. Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. And the City of Willcox, Arizona,petitioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Gas Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. Southern Union Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of California, General Motors Corp., Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Tucson Gas and Electric Co., Southern California Gas Co., Arizona Public Service Co., San Diego Gas & Electric Co., El Paso Natural Gas Co., Arizona Electric Power Coop., Inc., Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Southwest Gas Corp., Southern California Edison Co., Intervenors. Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., San Diego Gas & Electric Co., the People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of California, General Motors Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Southern Union Company, Southwest Gas Corp., Intervenors. Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. And the City of Willcox, Arizona v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Gas Co., Southwest Gas Corp., Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, El Paso Natural Gas Co., Southern Union Co., General Motors Corporation, Intervenors. Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. And the City of Willcox, Arizona v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, People of the State of California, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Arizona Public Service Company, Southern California Gas Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 13, 1980No. 77-1676PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
631 F.2d 802
203 U.S.App.D.C. 220
ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
Southern Union Gas Co., Southern California Gas Co., El Paso
Natural Gas Co., Pacific Gas & Electric Co., People of the
State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of
the State of California, Intervenors.
ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. and City of
Willcox, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
Asarco, Inc., et al., Southern Union Company, People of the
State of California, et al., General Motors Corporation,
Pac…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alton & Southern Railway Company v. International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- City of Willcox v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Process Gas Consumers Group v. U. S. Department of Agriculture, John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. United Gas Pipe Line Company v. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Intervenors. The Process Gas Consumers Group v. United States Department of Energy, the Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, American Bakers Association, Intervenors. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Distribution Companies, Intervenors. United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation, Intervenor. United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (Two Cases). The Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of New York, Intervenor. State of Louisiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (Two Cases). Columbia Nitrogen Corporation and Nipro, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, First Mississippi Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (Two Cases). Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (Two Cases). Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (Two Cases). United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Process Gas Consumers Group, American Industrial Clay Company of Sandersville and Georgia Kaolin Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Fertilizer Institute v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, National Food Processors Association v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Eli Lilly & Company v. United States Department of Energy, the Process Gas Consumers Group, American Industrial Clay Company of Sandersville and Georgia Kaolin Company v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. United Distribution Companies v. United States Department of Agriculture and Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. United Distribution Companies v. United States Department of Agriculture and Bob Bergland, Sec. Of Agriculture, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. United Gas Pipe Line Company v. U.S. Department of Agriculture and Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, United Distribution Companies, Intervenors. The Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Intervenors. United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Nitrogen Corp. And Nipro, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Atlanta Gas Light Co., Intervenors. United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. The Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Distribution Companies, Intervenors. United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Acosta v. Tribeca Landing L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Ali v. 1 World Trade Center, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Astudillo v. 90 Church Street Limited PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Bastidas v. 100 Church, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.