Legal Opinion

United States v. Raphael Howe, II

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2010No. 08-6541Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

COOK, Circuit Judge.

Raphael Howe appeals as substantively unreasonable his 151 months sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to possessing five or more grams of cocaine with intent to distribute and possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. Careful consideration of the arguments Howe advances reveals no abuse of discretion in the district court’s below-Guidelines sentencing and we thus affirm.

A sentence is substantively unreasonable where the district court “bas[es] the sentence on impermissible factors ... or giv[es] an unreasonable amount of weight to any pertinent factor.” United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. BlueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API