Legal Opinion

Gathen v. Gathen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 10, 2011No. 2010-CJ-2312PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVictory, J.

hWe granted this writ application to determine the appropriate standard of review of a trial court’s decision in a child relocation case, where the trial court does not expressly analyze each factor under La. R.S. 9:355.12 in determining whether relocation is in the best interest of the child. After review of the record and the applicable law, we find that while La. R.S. 9:355.12 mandates that the trial court consider all twelve factors listed in La. R.S. 9:355.12, its failure to expressly analyze each factor in its written or oral reasons does not constitute an error of law such that de novo…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Evans v. LungrinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. Fulco v. FulcoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. Bergeron v. BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Arabie v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  2. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  3. Pollard v. SchiffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Bonnette v. BonnetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. In re J.E.T.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API