Graves, Cox & Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Akündell :
The deficiency for redetermination in this proceeding is in income tax in the amount of $102.46 for 1929. The facts were stipulated.
At various times in 1919 the petitioner, a Kentucky corporation engaged in the general retail clothing business in Lexington of that State, purchased some furniture and fixtures and charged the costs thereof to its furniture and fixtures account. For the years 1919 to 1928, inclusive, it claimed and was allowed depreciation on the assets so acquired at the rate of 10 per cent per annum. In its return for 1929, the petitioner claimed depreciation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
3Cited by13 opinions
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Firemen's Ins. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.